Skip to main content
ATA methodology

The logic behinddefensible anchor evidence.

ATA follows a structured path from pre-test specification through loading, monitoring, and acceptance. The sequence below translates AS 5216, BS 8539, AEFAC TN05, and VicRoads Section 680 into practical field decisions.

Methodology controls
Proof load and hold period defined before site attendance
Confined versus unconfined configuration nominated in the brief
Monitoring profile set according to anchor risk and consequence
Escalation path documented if failures occur
Animated Explainer

How anchor testing works on site,step by step and decision by decision.

This sequence condenses the practical workflow behind AEFAC TN05, BS 8539, AS 5216 and VicRoads Section 680. It is not a substitute for a project-specific test specification, but it shows the logic inspectors, engineers and contractors are expected to follow in the field.

Test Sequence
Field workflow animation
Active checkpoint
  • Confirm anchor type, substrate, embedment depth and installation crew.
  • Set proof load from the governing project standard or engineering specification.
  • Nominate monitoring profile: load only, first-visual or full displacement logging.
Rig Schematic
Define the test before site loading starts
Gauge state
Pre-check
No acceptance decision yet
SETUPTEST REPORTLOADApplied tensile loadReaction bridgeHydraulic jackCouplerSupport legBase material / substratehef
Configuration
Rig and datum setup
Monitoring
Visual checks + alignment
Outcome
No final verdict yet
Proof Load Acceptance
What the engineer is looking for during the hold period
Proof loadLoadTimeSeatingRampHoldReview
Ramp
Controlled loading
Progressive increase avoids shock effects and reveals early slip.
Proof load
Target load achieved
Derived before testing from the governing design basis.
Hold
30-60 seconds
VicRoads typically requires the longer hold duration.
Assessment
<=10% decay
Peak versus sustained load plus movement observations determine outcome.
AEFAC Escalation Logic
Failures change the sample size, not just the test result
0 failures
Test 2.5% of the population, minimum 3 anchors.
1 failure
Increase to 5% of the population, minimum 6 anchors.
2+ failures
Escalate to 100% testing of the population.
Population definition

Sampling only makes sense when the population is consistent: same anchor type, same substrate, same installation method and same installer cohort. Change any of those variables and the standard treats it as a new population.

Important note

Final proof load, hold duration, displacement limits and test quantities must still be set by the responsible engineer and project specification. The animation shows the governing logic from the standards, but the test plan remains project-specific.

Testing Framework

Choosing the right test type

Proof Test

Non-destructive. Verifies correct installation by loading anchors to a prescribed proof load. Tests performed on working anchors intended for use on the project.

Investigate installation quality
Test design assumptions against as-built performance
Confined or unconfined configuration
References: BS 8539 §9.3 + Annex B.3 · AEFAC TN05 Vol 2

Ultimate Test

Destructive. Determines actual anchor capacity in a given substrate. Anchors tested to failure on sacrificial specimens not intended for project use.

Determine strength in unknown substrates
Application outside ETA scope
Statistical (≥15 tests) or simplified (5 tests) methods
References: BS 8539 Annex B.2.3 · AEFAC TN05 Vol 3
Proof Testing

Step-by-step methodology

01

Preparation

  • Verify anchors match structural drawings (size, type, location)
  • Confirm base material has achieved minimum specified strength
  • Remove obstructions and fixtures from test anchors
  • Clean anchors, remove excess epoxy, burrs, and grime
  • Assemble test rig with correct leg spacing for configuration type
02

Execute Test

  • Attach coupler to threaded rod or jaw set to reinforcing bar
  • Align test rig parallel to anchor to avoid inducing bending
  • Apply load progressively, achieve proof load within 1–3 minutes
  • Hold proof load for minimum 30 seconds (60 seconds per VicRoads)
  • Monitor gauge for sudden load drops or static readings
  • Listen for crackling; watch for displacement, cracking, or spalling
03

Assess & Report

  • Record peak load and sustained load (load after 30-second hold)
  • Check sustained load is within 10% of peak load
  • Document any observations: load slip, movement, spalling
  • Photograph test setup and results for engineering review
  • Mark test number next to anchor; include "F" if failed
  • Submit RPEQ-backed test report to responsible engineer

Deriving Proof Loads

VicRoads S680
Uncracked concrete
1.5× serviceability load
Standard condition, lower multiplier
VicRoads S680
Cracked concrete
2× serviceability load
Degraded substrate, higher multiplier required
BS 8539 / AEFAC
Statistical method
N_k × v_P,test
v_P,test = 1.5 (2.5% sample) or 1.25 (5% sample)

Critical limit: Proof load must not exceed 0.7× yield capacity of the fastener steel to prevent permanent damage. Proof load held for minimum 30 seconds (AEFAC) or 60 seconds (VicRoads). Load must not drop more than 10% during hold period.

Configuration

Confined vs unconfined

Confined Configuration

Test rig supports sit close to anchor, restricting base material breakout.

Suitable for checking installation quality of chemical anchors
Assesses bond between chemical and concrete
Appropriate for reinforcing bar connections designed under AS 3600
May not detect gross errors in embedment depth
Min. leg spacing: ≥ 0.75 × hef (proof tests)

Unconfined Configuration

Test rig supports placed outside cone perimeter, allowing all failure modes.

Allows all possible failure modes including concrete cone breakout
Required for all ultimate tests
Better at detecting embedment depth errors
Recommended for masonry and rock substrates
Requires load spreader bridge for wider spacing
Min. leg spacing: ≥ 2.0 × hef (ultimate tests)
Test Quantities

How many anchors to test?

VicRoads provides the most comprehensive guidance on test quantities based on lot size. AEFAC recommends a minimum of 3 specimens or 2.5% of the population, whichever is greater.

AEFAC Escalation Protocol
0 failures:Test 2.5% or minimum 3 anchors
1 failure:Increase to 5% or minimum 6 anchors
2+ failures:Test 100% of anchors in population

A test sample population is defined as anchors with the same type, same base material, same installation method, and same installation personnel. Where any of these change, it constitutes a separate population.

VicRoads Table 680.091 - Proof Test Quantities

Lot Size
Tensile / Combined
Other Anchors
1–50
100%
5%
51–150
50%
5%
151–300
25%
5%
301–500
20%
5%
501–1,000
15%
5%
>1,000
10%
5%
Reference Standards

Standards & guidelines

AS 5216:2021
Design of post-installed and cast-in fastenings in concrete

Australian anchor design standard covering anchor theory, concrete cone design model, and capacity calculations for post-installed and cast-in fastenings.

BS 8539:2012+A1:2021
Code of Practice for selection and installation of post-installed anchors

British Standard providing comprehensive guidance on anchor selection, installation, testing (proof and ultimate), and reporting. Defines test regimes in Annex B.

AEFAC TN05 Vols 1–4
Site Testing Guidelines

Australian guidelines covering general testing procedures (Vol 1), proof tests (Vol 2), ultimate tests (Vol 3), and testing in masonry (Vol 4). Published by Australian Engineered Fasteners and Anchors Council.

VicRoads Section 680
Bonded Anchors - Standard Specification

First Australian industry body to codify anchor testing. Specifies proof load multipliers (1.5× serviceability, 2× cracked concrete), test quantities by lot size, and 60-second hold requirement.

EOTA TR 054:2016
Design Methods for Anchorages with Metal Injection Anchors for Use in Masonry

European standard for masonry anchor design. Covers masonry-specific failure modes including brick pull-out and brick push-out. Referenced in absence of Australian masonry anchor standard.

AS 3600:2018
Concrete structures

Australian concrete design standard. Post-installed reinforcing bar may be designed as cast-in reinforcing bar under AS 3600 when development and lapping requirements are satisfied (Reinforcing Bar Theory).

CIRIA C778
Management of Safety-Critical Fixings

UK guidance for the management and design of safety-critical fixings. Covers risk review, work planning, cyclical inspection, and incident case studies from infrastructure failures.

AS/NZS 1170.0:2002
Structural design actions - General principles

Provides test report format and requirements for structural testing including load test data reporting, environmental conditions, and evaluation methodology.

AS 5532:2025
Manufacturing requirements for single-point anchor devices

Specifies performance requirements and test methods for fall arrest anchor devices used in harness-based work at height. Introduces four rated capacity levels (12 kN, 15 kN, 18 kN, 21 kN) and substrate-specific testing requirements.

AS/NZS 1891.4:2025
Personal equipment for work at height - Selection, use and maintenance

Covers selection, safe use, inspection, and maintenance of fall arrest systems including anchors, harnesses, lanyards, and lifelines. Requires proof testing of drilled-in anchors at 50% of design ultimate strength.

Apply the method

Need this methodology adapted to your anchor programme?

We can help define proof loads, sampling rates, monitoring requirements, and the reporting basis before testing is booked.